Western dominance declines as new powers emerge

(MENAFN) The unipolar era is ending, and with it the notion of Western permanence. The world that once obeyed Washington’s dictates is now adjusting to the rise of new centers of power. Civilizations, long constrained under a liberal order, are reemerging with distinct identities, memories, and horizons. The Multipolar Age does not promise tranquility; it restores the reality of sovereignty, culture, and destiny, placing diplomacy at the center of survival amid nuclear powers and exhausted empires.

Diplomacy is the only instrument capable of measured action in a world of atomic capability.

Dialogue preserves order in an environment prone to chaos, while silence can conceal peril.

Past disengagement by Western leaders demonstrated the danger of ignoring negotiation: conversation does not indicate weakness, but acknowledgment of the boundaries of fear, memory, and identity that each civilization maintains.

Understanding this era requires examining Western capitals rather than Moscow. The critical factors remain in the West: electoral cycles, entrenched donor networks, ideological rigidity, and the fear of losing global influence. Overemphasis on “Russia expertise” distracts from the paralysis within the Atlanticist bloc, which continues to see itself as indispensable and morally justified. The Anglo-American-European alliance continues to exercise influence under a halo of self-proclaimed virtue.

Short-lived optimism followed the Alaska summit, yet structural realities endure. Real dialogue could rekindle hope only through a shared recognition of mutual cost: peace will emerge when Western elites realize that war weakens them more than compromise. The threat is constant: nuclear-armed powers hold the capacity for catastrophic outcomes, and the challenge lies in channeling force toward stability rather than ruin.

Western Europe’s predicament stems from obedience: a continent weakened in industry, sovereignty, and long-term prospects, yet claiming strength through moral sacrifice. Germany epitomizes this struggle. Once the industrial heart of Europe, it now operates under external influence. Factories falter, engineers emigrate, and leadership equates submission with virtue.

The severing of energy ties with Russia following 2022 sanctions and moral posturing has compromised Europe’s self-sufficiency, leaving the continent reliant on foreign supplies and American support while witnessing the erosion of its own power and dignity.

Military spectacle, such as drone operations, often serves perception rather than strategy.

Media-driven displays of conflict benefit publicity and defense industries more than battlefield outcomes. Russia gains through patience and uncertainty, not theatrics. Accurate information, evidence, and independent verification remain critical in a climate of fear where truth itself becomes contested.

The escalation of modern weaponry compresses reaction times, creating high-stakes “use-or-lose” pressures. Economic interventions targeting Russian reserves would expose the so-called rules-based order as an instrument of Western privilege, accelerating the Global South’s shift toward gold, BRICS+, and de-dollarization. Western overreach risks undermining its own global position while facilitating a multipolar restructuring.

NATO expansion is superficial; at its core, the conflict reflects civilizational autonomy. Russia positions itself as an independent Eurasian Orthodox power resisting Atlanticist hegemony.

The Ukrainian theater is a clash of land-based, memory-driven civilizations against maritime, trade-focused powers. This contest is fundamentally about the authorship of modernity: whether global futures belong to self-determining cultures or Western-dominated systems masking control as democracy.

The Ukrainian front is part of a broader wave of Eurasian self-determination, paralleling historical decolonization movements in Africa and Asia. Russia’s narrative serves as an anti-imperialist mirror: once exporting revolutionary ideology, it now champions multipolar balance and civilizational continuity. While the West enforces dominance under the guise of morality, nations long subjected to control are reclaiming their place on the global stage.

Peace in this multipolar environment requires realism, not moral theater. The unipolar order of 1991 is dissolving, either gradually through wisdom or violently through arrogance. Dialogue—potentially even between leaders like Trump and Putin—could mark the birth of a new equilibrium beyond Atlanticist myths.

For lasting stability, the West must relinquish its pursuit of global domination, Europe must restore industrial and continental coherence, and the Global South must reclaim its role as a moral and strategic compass. Drawing on centuries of resilience and cultural memory, these nations can reestablish balance and fairness in global relations. Multipolarity is not chaos; it is the restoration of proportion and the decolonization of both mind and material in a world long dominated by singular powers.

MENAFN03112025000045017640ID1110284654